Choose your languahe here:
Arabic AR Chinese (Simplified) ZH-CN Danish DA Dutch NL English EN French FR German DE Greek EL Hebrew IW Hindi HI Italian IT Macedonian MK Portuguese PT Spanish ES Turkish TR Ukrainian UK

Scientific Newsletter #10

Stuck in Framework Prison? By Scott Ambler, Vice President and Chief Scientist of PMI

Again this week, I thank you for being here.

On a Monday morning, I set out to give a workshop at an Agile conference in Austria. To be honest, I’ve never liked getting up early, and I’m barely aware of my surroundings until I’ve been awake for a few hours. I do remember, however, that the plane was crowded and noisy. I was concentrating on the material for my presentation when I overheard someone talking about something that caught my attention.

Four people next to me were eagerly discussing human rights, Trump, and the situation in Europe. Each represented their own passionate and well-crafted point of view, based on information that seemed factual and solid. The conversation drifted to other parts of the world, such as North Korea and the United States, and then to the 9/11 conspiracy theory and the explosives allegedly planted by the U.S. government in the towers’ parking garages. Finally, someone concluded that mankind never reached the moon.

At first, the conversation thread seemed reasonable, but it became less and less reasonable. They took turns pointing out that there were no stars in Armstrong’s photos of the moon landing, that there could’ve been no waves on the flag because there’s no wind on the moon, that the astronauts’ shadows couldn’t be real… The more they presented their “scientific” evidence, the more the others contradicted.

Although I’m not particularly sociable in the morning, I decided to weigh in – before someone concludes that Walt Disney staged the moon landing, which would only lead to someone claiming that the filmmaker was being kept frozen in a top-secret base in the U.S. near Roswell…

"We must be careful not to believe things simply because we want them 
to be true. No one can fool you as easily as you can fool yourself!"
Richard Feynman, Physicist

I offered what I believe to be irrefutable information: There’s a laser reflector (Laser Ranging Retroreflector or LRR) on the Moon that was installed by Apollo 11 during their mission. Its main purpose is to reflect back a laser launched from Earth to measure the distance between the two. I added that the reflector has been in operation for over four decades.

After listening to me, however, they were far from convinced and tried to refute my claim with dozens of new arguments. They continued with their rhetoric, adding that no one could’ve filmed Armstrong because the radiation would have melted the cameras and that the delay in communications was less than it should have been, given the technology of the time. How was it possible that logic didn’t prevail and that these people didn’t change their minds after hearing me?

This is the result of what we call Confirmation Bias. I define Confirmation Bias as the process of assembling a selective collection of evidence to confirm a position. Many employees or groups tend to favor information that confirms their preconceived notions or hypotheses, regardless of their accuracy.

Confirmation bias was initially demonstrated in the 1960s by Peter C. Wason, a cognitive psychologist at University College London

We see this all the time in companies: a team that doesn’t talk to the customer but makes decisions about what the customer might like or dislike about the product, or a product owner who creates multiple user-profiles and makes decisions without soliciting customer feedback in person (or only solicits it every few months). We also observe confirmation bias in discussions: Someone trying to lead others by pushing the idea that their process, framework, or anything else is better (e.g., Agile vs. Waterfall, SAFe vs. LeSS, LeSS vs Disciplined Agile, etc.).

As humans, we’ve a psychological need to create clear structures in our minds as we observe the world around us. At the same time, we try to confirm our existing beliefs in everything we see. In this way, we try to predict patterns and behaviors in others in order to decide how to act in the short and medium-term. But this mental process can be a trap if we’re not aware of it.

In my opinion, one of the most powerful tools any consultant or leader can have is to be aware of their confirmation bias.

How about posting in the comments what your favorite technique for overcoming confirmation bias is?

Upcoming Free Advanced Events For Change Consultants

This month, we’re working hard to help the global community learn more about Enterprise Agility, new ways or perspectives on leadership, and new theories for human resources/people. That’s why we’re organizing several free events that will surprise you!

Click on the video or here to learn more

Get the full list of events at EnterpriseAgility.University/Events

Our Coming Courses from the Enterprise Agility University

For many of you, the beginning of the year is synonymous with planning for the next few months in terms of careers and courses. We’re pleased to announce that in March we’ll continue our Certified Change Consultant and Certified Enterprise Agility Leadership Programs in various parts of the world. If you’re in a time zone near the Trainer, we invite you to connect with them and give your organizational change career a boost with the upcoming distance training.

Irena Pavlovska, Europe, Certified Change Consultant, April 23rd

Irena Pavlovska, Europe, Certified EA Leadership (I), March 5th

Sandip Rananavare, Asia Pacific, Certified Change Consultant, March 26th

Sandip Rananavare, Asia Pacific, Certified EA Leadership (I), March 22nd

Rose Restrepo, Colombia, Certified Change Consultant, March 5th 

Greg Pitcher & PK Savy, Asia Pacific, Certified Change Consultant, March 31st

Stuck in Framework Prison? How to Become a Learning Organization

By Scott Ambler, Vice President and Chief Scientist of Disciplined Agile at PMI (Canada)

Although adopting an agile framework can be a good first step on your improvement journey, your real goal is to become a learning organization. Learning organizations are able to develop their own fit-for-purpose WoW, which can be a mix of approaches and enable them to outperform others.

The Disciplined Agile (DA) Toolkit teaches you what agile frameworks can’t – how to get better at getting better.

Click on the video or here to watch it

From Enterprise Agility University, we hope you found our scientific newsletter useful, and we’ll see you next week.

Leave a Reply